LAPD Revises Terror Policy but Still Labels Photographers as Potential Terrorists - PINAC News
Connect
To Top

LAPD Revises Terror Policy but Still Labels Photographers as Potential Terrorists

lapd_chief_charlie_beck.jpg

While various Southern California news sites are reporting that the Los Angeles Police Department has revised its terror policy to allow police to detain photographers as potential terrorists, that has actually been its policy since at least 2008.

The only thing that has changed is now the Suspicious Activity Report reminds officers that they are not allowed to profile citizens based on ethnicity or race.

It also throws in a disclaimer that photography and other listed activity is “generally protected by the First Amendment” and that officers should look for actual evidence of criminal activity before detaining citizens.

But cops are never known to read the fine print. And apparently neither are mainstream journalists who are treating this as a new policy change.

From the Los Angeles Times:

Over the objections of some civil liberties groups, the Los Angeles Police Commission approved controversial new guidelines Tuesday for when LAPD officers can document suspicious behavior they believe could be linked to terrorism.

The five-member civilian oversight panel unanimously approved a special order that gives officers the authority to write reports on people whose actions might not break any laws, such as taking a photograph of a power plant.

From the Los Angeles Weekly:

Even as America has remained fairly free of foreign terrorism in recent years, the LAPD this week moved ahead with an official policy that considers taking photos and videotaping of some buildings suspicious activity.

The LAPD is obviously not deterred by a lawsuit filed by the ACLU last year against the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department where deputies displayed an ongoing pattern of detaining photographers for simply taking photos.

Below are screenshots from page 40 of the 52-page 2008 policy regarding photographers followed by page five of the revised policy from last month followed by the disclaimer.

2008_lapd_policy.jpg

revised_lapd_policy.jpg

lapd_disclaimer.jpg


Please send stories, tips and videos to carlosmiller@magiccitymedia.com.

CARLOS MILLER’S LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

I am immersed in a legal case where I not only want to clear my criminal charges stemming from my arrest in January, but I want to sue the Miami-Dade Police Department for deleting my footage, which I was able to recover.

My goal is to set some type of precedent to ensure this does not happen as often as it does today where cops simply get away with it.

So if you would like to contribute, please click on the “donate” button below and contribute whatever you can afford.

Facebook PINAC Page

You can keep up with my stories by friending me on Facebook or following me on Twitter and/or Google + or by liking the PINAC Facebook page.

cloudfront image

Hair Transplant 

Also, in an unrelated PINAC matter, I recently went through a hair transplant operation and I’m documenting my recovery on this blog if you are interested. I did not pay for this transplant, which is why I’m promoting the doctor through the hair transplant blog.

lapd_chief_charlie_beck.jpg

While various Southern California news sites are reporting that the Los Angeles Police Department has revised its terror policy to allow police to detain photographers as potential terrorists, that has actually been its policy since at least 2008.

The only thing that has changed is now the Suspicious Activity Report reminds officers that they are not allowed to profile citizens based on ethnicity or race.

It also throws in a disclaimer that photography and other listed activity is “generally protected by the First Amendment” and that officers should look for actual evidence of criminal activity before detaining citizens.

But cops are never known to read the fine print. And apparently neither are mainstream journalists who are treating this as a new policy change.

From the Los Angeles Times:

Over the objections of some civil liberties groups, the Los Angeles Police Commission approved controversial new guidelines Tuesday for when LAPD officers can document suspicious behavior they believe could be linked to terrorism.

The five-member civilian oversight panel unanimously approved a special order that gives officers the authority to write reports on people whose actions might not break any laws, such as taking a photograph of a power plant.

From the Los Angeles Weekly:

Even as America has remained fairly free of foreign terrorism in recent years, the LAPD this week moved ahead with an official policy that considers taking photos and videotaping of some buildings suspicious activity.

The LAPD is obviously not deterred by a lawsuit filed by the ACLU last year against the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department where deputies displayed an ongoing pattern of detaining photographers for simply taking photos.

Below are screenshots from page 40 of the 52-page 2008 policy regarding photographers followed by page five of the revised policy from last month followed by the disclaimer.

2008_lapd_policy.jpg

revised_lapd_policy.jpg

lapd_disclaimer.jpg


Please send stories, tips and videos to carlosmiller@magiccitymedia.com.

CARLOS MILLER’S LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

I am immersed in a legal case where I not only want to clear my criminal charges stemming from my arrest in January, but I want to sue the Miami-Dade Police Department for deleting my footage, which I was able to recover.

My goal is to set some type of precedent to ensure this does not happen as often as it does today where cops simply get away with it.

So if you would like to contribute, please click on the “donate” button below and contribute whatever you can afford.

Facebook PINAC Page

You can keep up with my stories by friending me on Facebook or following me on Twitter and/or Google + or by liking the PINAC Facebook page.

cloudfront image

Hair Transplant 

Also, in an unrelated PINAC matter, I recently went through a hair transplant operation and I’m documenting my recovery on this blog if you are interested. I did not pay for this transplant, which is why I’m promoting the doctor through the hair transplant blog.

More in PINAC News