San Diego Sheriff's Sergeant Attempts to Intimidate News Videographer

Another cop tried to play news editor with a photojournalist by standing in front of his camera and informing him it was in “bad taste” to video record the investigation of a traffic fatality.

The San Diego Sheriff’s Sergeant, who sounds like she said her name is “Guerra,” but correct me if I’m wrong, then proclaimed it was her First Amendment right to block his camera.

But photojournalist JC Playford said she didn’t have the right to interfere with his work.

She ended up walking away and he ended up getting his footage, which shows the tragic aftermath of a motorcyclist’s body under a tarp being lifted into the back of the coroner’s van.

While the sergeant believes it was disrespectful to the man’s family, it is, in fact, educational for anybody driving the streets that life can be very fleeting.

Playford, who has been arrested four times while recording authorities, is a plaintiff in a lawsuit against the San Diego Sheriff’s Department and the San Diego Police Department over press credentials.

According to the North County Times:

San Diego police issued freelance journalist James Charles Playford a press credential but later took it away after someone filed a restraining order against him, a police spokesman said earlier this year.

After that, American News and Information Services issued Playford one of its own press credentials. But San Diego County law enforcement officials have not routinely honored the privately issued credentials, the lawsuit says.

San Diego County sheriff’s deputies have arrested Playford four times since 2010 on suspicion of obstructing them in the performance of their duties. Playford, who has a reputation among police agencies for being loud and aggressive in his coverage, was filming police activity and did not comply with sheriff’s deputies’ orders to identify himself, move or leave.


About Carlos Miller

Carlos Miller is founder and publisher of Photography is Not a Crime, which began as a one-man blog in 2007 to document his trial after he was arrested for photographing police during a journalistic assignment. He is also the author of The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which can be purchased through Amazon.

Check Also

LAPD responded to this man flagging them down by shooting him in the head.

Los Angeles Man Shot in Face by LAPD After Asking for Help Makes First Public Appearance

Nearly four months after Los Angeles police officers shot a man in the face who had …

  • Saber

    This video is tasteless, and proves the videographer has no class no class.
    The L.E.O is right in this situation. Totally uncalled for.

    If you want to stand up for your 1st amendment rights, go to the airport and film the TSA. You’ll definitely be accosted by them, and probably whatever cops are working with them. Or go to a protest and confront the jack-booted nazis running crowd control.
    I’m a constitutional conservative, and its my opinion that the Officer was right.

    • Kilroy238

      If so, then you’re really not much of a “constitutional conservative” are you? If you really were then you would be one of the first to say that an opinion of bad taste is irrelevant.

    • sfmc98

      You must be new here.

      The publisher of this blog, Carlos Miller, actually does regularly film the TSA. The majority of the readers here believe in the right to do that just the same as filming an accident scene.

      When you say “the officer was right,” do you mean that she has the right to make him stop filming? Or that it was her opinion that it was in poor taste?

  • Tom

    Good for the cop!!! The guy with the camera is SCUM.

    I’m against all the attacks on our constitution… but this guy goes a little to far. Show some respect for the deceased and their family. This video is NOT news and should be yanked

    • Kilroy238

      So you’re against attacks on the constitution but only when you happen to agree or identify with the one being attacked. Interesting.

    • Name

      Of course it’s news. Watch your local news broadcast for an accident report and you’ll see footage of the police investigating the scene. That’s exactly what this footage is. Where do you think that footage comes from? It comes from guys like this who film the scene.

    • JDS

      So, Tom draws the line, folks. Next time you question whether or not something should be filmed, check with Tom.

    • sfmc98

      As I said to the guy above, you must be new here. When you say “this guy goes a little too far,” are you saying that you believe what he is doing isn’t constitutionally protected? Because if it is, then the cop has no business trying to make him stop.

    • JohnLloydScharf

      Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.
      Letter to Dr. James Currie (28 January 1786) from Thomas Jefferson

  • Steve

    I think the Officer is right. She spoke the truth and showed restraint in walking away after speaking her mind. This idiot with the camera should get a life.
    I have to agree with everything posted before me. The “photojournalist” is a POS.

    • sfmc98

      “The “photojournalist” is a POS.”

      You put photojournalist in doubt quotation marks. Tell me why. Is it because you disagree with his manner of filming? Why is he a POS? For covering a newsworthy event?

  • Molly

    My Boss and my coworkers have all read this article. We all agree. This guy is not a photojournalist. He’s nothing more than a hack. Bad form, poor taste, and too much time on his hands. If he really wants to defend the constitution, go find the real tyrants. These officers were not doing anything improper. I agree with the officer.

    • Name

      I guess your boss and coworkers don’t understand local news reporting, then, because there’s nothing wrong with taking a shot of an accident scene. The editor decides what footage to use, not the cameraman. The cameraman just gets lots of footage so the editor can make those decisions.

    • JDS

      Poor taste is not unconstitutional.

    • sfmc98

      “This guy is not a photojournalist. He’s nothing more than a hack.”

      This whole site is dedicated to who you call “hacks.” Basically citizen photojournalists who cover car crashes, police, demonstrations or anything of concern. Some of us don’t even have cheaply priced camera equipment but an Iphone or digital recorder. Proud to be a hack. The cop has no business stopping citizen photojournalists if they are participating in legal activity.

      By the way, why bring up your bosses and coworkers? Are they arbiters of who can be called a photojournalist or not?

  • WorseThanDetroit

    The police aren’t there to enforce moral decency. They’re there to enforce the law. The officer should mind her own business.

  • Ryan French

    Fantastic, some of you believe the police should enforce their moral opinions on others. Professionally, I wouldn’t have shot video of the body bag, but the SGT has absolutely no say in the matter. She should spend more time ensuring her deputies are completing a thorough traffic fatality investigation so the family can have some closure as to what happened. That would be doing her job though.

  • Common Sense

    Ok, lets leave the morality out of it! If that was the case, then most everyone in public office would have to leave. I understand what the officer is doing, yet the photographer has done NOTHING wrong. He has every right to film the scene. The officer has clearly over stepped her duties.

  • sfmc98

    Wow, apparently, you’ve got some new readers! Hopefully everyone followed you from Pixiq but jeez, seems like some folks aren’t even aware of the nature of this blog.

    By the way, cool that you went with Disqus.

  • JohnLloydScharf

    I suggest not being killed in a public place. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public place. It is up to the reporter to decide when and how it will be appropriate to publish, but you have to get the information/picture first. The government has no right to decide who is or is not a news gatherer. They also do not have a right to decide what is “appropriate.”

  • JohnLloydScharf

    You should not have to be “recognized” by an officer to collect news and information.

Story continues below...

Want to support the investigative journalism you're reading on Use this button to make a donation of any amount to "The PINAC Fund"

Please donate to The PINAC Fund a 501(c)3 charitable fund that supports our investigative journalism efforts. Once we reach 1000 subscribers, then we'll launch the ad free and premium version for subscribers!

Monthly Tax Deductible Donation to the PINAC Fund